Suggestions
From Colony 337 Wiki
| Colony |
| 337 |
| Wiki |
Contents |
What this page is
It is a place for all of the wiki users to agree on how to run the wiki, what data should be in it, what is considered correct editing, etc.
If you were expecting a place to give suggestions about the game, you should go to the forums
Under discussion
Vandalism
Well, this edit could be considered our first ever case of vandalism. should we start thinking in a policy about vandalism?--Ch3-T 15:24, 28 February 2008 (EST)
Yeah, I think some sections should be off limits to other teams editing, such as a teams personal page. I like the way I responded better than how my team mate did, sorry about that. D-Caf 17:37, 28 February 2008 (EST)
- I agree that team and user pages should be edited only by team members or the user. Anyone else should post on the corresponding talk page. In the meantime, a couple more possible vandalism cases have occurred, both by Truthbot. --Oktavius 14:37, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
I noticed that today as well, but as far as I know there isn't a way to lock certain sections to certain users. But I'm pretty naive when it comes to wiki works. -- D-Caf 14:56, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
Fan fiction
The Sword of 1000 Moves and the Robot Classes are not directly related to the game or game mechanics. the first looks like just an attempt to get some attention/recruiting, the second, just an attempt at humour. In my opinion the 1k sword should be moved to Lone Star Strikers/Sword of 1000 Moves since it's just that group using it as advertising, the second one actually looks like some sort of fan art. Should we start a fan fiction category? --Ch3-T 15:24, 28 February 2008 (EST)
- For the sword see also the discussion in Talk:Weapons. I agree that tagging the fictional articles with a special category will be helpful. --Oktavius 19:26, 3 March 2008 (EST)
Unsigned comments
What do we do with unsigned comments (such as this)? I like the common policy of other wikis to include a line saying "the preceding comment was posted by X on <date>. <signature of person writing this comment>". In that case could we use a template to make this easier? --Oktavius 14:37, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
